Every major claim should have a status.
Resurrection Reserve separates subjects into practical categories so an existing service is never mistaken for proof of a future outcome.
Available today
A service, technique or planning action exists now. This label does not imply that every provider is good or that every future use is proven.
Active research / developing
There is genuine scientific or technical work underway, but capabilities, safety, availability or eventual limits remain uncertain.
Speculative / unproven
The proposed future outcome has not been demonstrated. It must never be written as if it is an available service.
Source hierarchy
For scientific and medical claims, future content should prefer peer-reviewed research, recognised scientific institutions, regulators and primary documentation. Provider marketing can explain what a provider says it offers, but should not be used as independent proof that extraordinary outcomes are possible.
Dates matter
Future-facing subjects change. Detailed guides should show when they were reviewed and distinguish established knowledge from recent developments.
Corrections
Material claims should be corrected when stronger evidence changes the picture. The aim is not to defend a prediction; it is to keep the planning framework useful and credible.